China has now restricted travel for over 35 million people in 12 cities due to the coronavirus outbreak that was said to originate in Wuhan, China. Now, more than two thousand confirmed cases have been reported, in countries such as China, Vietnam, Thailand, Japan, France, Australia, Canada, and the U.S. Coincidentally enough, this "outbreak" coincides with the Chinese New Year, with 2020 as the "Year Of The RAT"....
The U.S. has also enforced screenings in five airports so far, due to “confirmed cases.”
But What Is The REAL TRUTH About This “Coronavirus?”
And did it REALLY originate from China to begin with, or is there ANOTHER Origin?
Why are there coronavirus patents relating to the use of such a coronavirus in a vaccine to “prevent and/or treat a disease?” Per the current assignees belonging to the Pirbright Institute, and also the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) along with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) — The better question is, WHO Are The Ones FUNDING Such Patents and Vaccines?
It’s also no coincidence how in spring 2018, Bill Gates informed listeners at a discussion about epidemics hosted by the Massachusetts Medical Society and the New England Journal of Medicine that a “new disease” could kill 30 million within 6 months, and how it could happen posthaste. And, from a TED Talk back in 2010, Bill Gates even quoted: “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care & reproductive health services, we could LOWER that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
But Do You Know The BIGGER Agenda?
Did you know that World Governments and Alphabet Soups such as the WHO, CDC, UN, FDA, FEMA, etc. team up together and travel into what they call “third-world countries," bringing their Killer Vaccines with them? They then vaccinate the women and children there, when they are purposefully causing and spreading diseases. Once these diseases have been spread, and an "epidemic" has been declared, they then label this "epidemic" with a creative name, such as "Ebola."
Then, mainstream medias such as ABC, FOX, CNN, etc. report an "epidemic" initially caused by the Government to begin with, to make you think it's a worldwide "epidemic" when really this isn't the case at all. This thusly triggers fear and chaos in the general sleeping public, thereby giving the Government more tyrannical control.
In order to offer a solution to their created problem, the Government begins to enforce the Rule of Law — such as mandatory vaccines, mandatory healthcare, mandatory screenings and other "security" measures leading up to martial law. When such measures only focus on one thing and one thing only: Depopulation. So that more people will gladly accept these Killer Vaccines.
Eduardo Galeano: "El mundo se divide en indignos e indignados"
The Crime of Ecocide
http://www.pollyhiggins.com/
"... move away from property laws to trusteeship laws, so rather than I own, to I owe. I owe a duty of care to this planet."
12-year old Victoria Grant explains why Canada (her homeland) and most of the world, is in debt.
"How the Media Frames Political Issues" by Scott London
In The Emergence of American Political Issues (1977) McCombs and Shaw state that the most important effect of the mass media is "its ability to mentally order and organize our world for us. In short, the mass media may not be successful in telling us what to think, but they are stunningly successful in telling us what to think about."[13] The presidential observer Theodore White corroborates this conclusion in The Making of a President (1972):
The power of the press in America is a primordial one. It sets the agenda of public discussion; and this sweeping political power is unrestrained by any law. It determines what people will talk and think about - an authority that in other nations is reserved for tyrants, priests, parties and mandarins.[14]
McCombs and Shaw also note that the media's tendency to structure voters' perceptions of political reality in effect constitutes a bias: "to a considerable degree the art of politics in a democracy is the art of determining which issue dimensions are of major interest to the public or can be made salient in order to win public support."[15] http://www.scottlondon.com/reports/frames.html